|
For over two years, concerned citizens around the world have been voicing their concerns about the safety of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Yet, time and time again, they have been dismissed and labelled as conspiracy theorists by the mainstream media and medical establishment.
|
However, recent developments have proven that these so-called conspiracy theories were, in fact, true all along.
Because confidential Pfizer documents, that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of for 75 years, but were subsequently forced to publish by order of the US Federal Court; and various scientific studies have confirmed that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine does in fact contain a highly toxic substance known as Graphene Oxide.
A substance that is so toxic that it has and still is destroying red blood cells and forming strange blood clots.
Unfortunately, the same confidential Pfizer documents and various scientific studies also confirm that ‘vaccine shedding’ has been occurring. A process in which individuals who received the Covid-19 vaccine unintentionally shed the contents of it to others.
This means the not-vaccinated population have also suffered and is continuing to suffer the highly toxic effects of Graphene Oxide entering the body alongside other serious adverse events induced by the Covid-19 vaccines.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The findings came as no surprise however, because a confidential Pfizer document given to the FDA had already confirmed shedding and exposure to the Covid-19 mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been injected with the Covid-19 “vaccine”.
The study, titled ‘Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity’, and published on 1st May 2022, was conducted by the following scientists for the University of Colorado –
- Ross M. Kedl, Elena Hsieh,
- Thomas E. Morrison,
- Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes,
- Siobhan Flaherty,
- Conner L. Jackson,
- Rosemary Rochford.
The abstract of the study reads as follows –
Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated.
The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.
And here are the study authors’ main findings –
The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals.
Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B) 4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday.
Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D).
Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route.
This proves Covid-19 vaccine shedding is perfectly possible when we take into account a study performed on behalf of Pfizer in Japan.
The study observed the distribution of the Covid-19 injection in the bodies of Wister Rats over a period of 48 hours. One of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time.
The highest concentration was noted in the liver. But it also accumulates in the salivary glands on the skin.
It is not known if the injection continues to accumulate after 48 hours due to observations being curiously halted after this amount of time in the study.
But these results, coupled with the first study above, tell us that for a minimum of 48 hours, an unvaccinated person is at risk of being exposed to the Covid-19 injection if they breathe the same air as or touch the skin of a person who has been vaccinated.
This should however come as no surprise because Pfizer admitted as much in their ‘A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ document.
The document contains a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity to someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.
Section 8.3.5 of the document, describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials.
So how can they be exposed?
Well, Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine.
The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Or if a male family member of a healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
In layman’s terms, Pfizer is admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.
All of this makes the findings in a study conducted by Dr Philippe van Welbergen all the more concerning.
Findings that are now supported as fact by the publication of a confidential Pfizer Document in February 2023.
A document that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to publish by order of the Federal Court in the USA. after arguing they wanted to delay the release of the documents for 75 years.
Dr Philippe van Welbergen (“Dr Philippe”), Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images last year of blood samples under the microscope.
At the beginning of July 2021, Dr Philippe was interviewed and explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.
Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood.
Then in February 2022, Dr Philippe presented images of his latest blood slides and explained what the images show. His slides showed that vaccine-free patients have been “infected” with vaccine toxins through shedding, including what was claimed to be at the time, but is now known to definitely be graphene thanks to the US Federal Court.
A full review of his slides can be viewed here. But here’s a short clip of his presentation –
What Dr Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated is that the graphene being injected into people is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge.
And the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations.
He also demonstrated that “shards” of graphene are being transmitted from “vaccinated” to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people, sadly destroying their red blood cells and causing strange blood clots.
Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.
The next image is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid drug. The blood is coagulated, and the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together.
The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres.
You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries.
You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells.
Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who had been given a Covid injection.
The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly.
Dr Philippe’s presentation is truly eye-opening and horrifying – a must-watch, especially for those who proclaim Covid injections are “safe” and are insisting people be injected. And the findings of Dr Phillippe’s study have now been proven as fact by the FDA being forced to publish confidential Pfizer documents.
The FDA had initially attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years, despite approving the injection after only 108 days of a safety review on December 11th, 2020.
However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.
In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.
One of the most recent documents published by the FDA saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”
What is most interesting about the study is that it confirms on page 7 that reduced Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine because it is needed as a base for the lipid nanoparticles.
Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –
A full investigation of the document can be read here. But this document proves that Graphene Oxide is indeed used in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 vaccine because it is vital in helping to make the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles stable.
Therefore, trace amounts or large amounts, depending on the batch of vaccine manufactured, of reduced Graphene Oxide inevitably make their way into the Pfizer Covid-19 injections.
The use of Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine has been a source of controversy and concern from the outset, with many individuals claiming that regulators and media outlets were deliberately misleading the public about its inclusion.
Despite initial denials, the documents released by the FDA, which they were forced to publish by order of the Federal Court in the USA. have confirmed the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer vaccine, raising questions about who we can trust.
But the Pfizer documents and studies also confirm Covid-19 vaccine shedding has been and still is occurring, destroying red blood cells and forming strange blood clots.
Therefore, it would appear there was never any need to waste an extortionate amount of taxpayers’ money on propaganda to coerce the public into getting the Covid-19 injections.
Because the taxpayer never had a choice in the matter.
All they had to do was breathe.
