By Eli Dumitru
I was raised in a liberal Democrat home and I had that bias for most of my life. I campaigned for Ralph Nader and was the facilitator for the Green Party’s local meeting in Eugene, Oregon during Nader’s run for President in 2000. Later, I was on the Steering Committee of GMO-Free Jackson County and was on the committee that wrote the county ordinance we passed banning GMO crops in Jackson County. Later, I was the Chair of Freedom to Say No to Smart Meters. I still hold all of the same principles of empowering the people over corporations & corrupt government as I always have. My research has led me to see that the corporate media is controlled by the multi-national corporations that fund it with their advertising dollars. I have seen that the government agencies that are supposed to regulate those corporations have become corrupted by them.
First, please watch this short, one minute clip of the Illinois Department of Public Health Director, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, explain how they get the Covid-19 death count:
https://week.com/2020/04/20/idph-director-explains-how-covid-deaths-are-classified/
also shown here: https://hoiabc.com/2020/04/20/idph-director-explains-how-covid-deaths-are-classified/
Those of us who had read the document from the director of the National Center for Health Statistics that instructed doctors and hospitals to lie about the cause of death, already knew this, but Dr. Ezike explained in plain English the technical terminology in this document:
The fallacy of attributing deaths to Covid-19 is further illustrated by the CDC’s own data:
“Comorbidities and other conditions”
“Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death.”
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm This document is periodically updated, so those numbers may change. The quote from above was updated February 17, 2021
That means, of the deaths “with” Covid-19, the 94% who had “comorbidities” were people who were already dying from 3.8 other causes. 94% had 3.8 comorbidities – means most of those people already had 4 diseases they were actually dying from, when they were counted as dying from Covid-19 because they died “with” Covid-19. And those other 6% where Covid-19 was the only cause mentioned, they could have been people who only displayed the symptoms, with no actual proof that they were caused by SARS-CoV-2 Virus, as spelled out in the document from the National Center for Health Statistics cited above:
Question: “Should “COVID-19” be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test?”
Answer: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.” (emphasis added).
All together it is clear that there is, in fact, no actual scientific evidence that any of the people listed as dying from Covid-19, died due to an infection from the SARS-CoV-2 Virus.
This isn’t only in America either (see: https://www.corbettreport.com/whats-up-with-the-italian-mortality-rate-questions-for-corbett-058/ ). That one fact that the death count is an intentional lie, is enough by itself to debunk the whole Covid-19 fraud, but it’s actually only the tip of the iceberg.
However, this is nothing new. Multinational corporations, the media they own and the government agencies they corrupt, have been lying to people in the name of “science” for decades. When the government, corporate scientists and media told us that cigarette smoking was safe, the people who looked at the actual science refuted that. They said the tobacco industry’s “science” wasn’t science at all, it was corruption. After that, the term “Tobacco Science” was used to label fake science put out by corporations (see: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tobacco%20science ).
When the government, corporate scientists and media told us that the nuclear power plants they had built were safe, the people who looked at the actual science refuted that and said that the corporate “science” wasn’t “science” at all, it was corruption, and they were proved to be right. The same is true for when the government, corporate scientists and media said that the pesticides they sprayed on our food was safe. This continues today with glyphosate, which was proven in court to cause cancer: “California Jury Awards $2 Billion To Couple In Roundup Weed Killer Cancer Trial”https://www.npr.org/2019/05/13/723056453/california-jury-awards-2-billion-to-couple-in-roundup-weed-killer-cancer-trial and “Jury Awards $80 Million In Damages In Roundup Weed Killer Cancer Trial”https://www.npr.org/2019/03/27/707439575/jury-awards-80-million-in-damages-in-roundup-weed-killer-cancer-trial and “$10B Roundup Settlement Covers Current and Future Claims” https://www.alllaw.com/glyphosate-roundup-claims/10b-roundup-settlement-covers-current-and-future-claims.html .
Yet, amazingly, our government still allows Bayer to sell Roundup weed killer with glyphosate. Where is the media outcry on this travesty? Answer: It is silenced by Bayer’s advertising dollars paid to the media. Same thing with the lies that GMOs are safe and that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, all deadly lies in the name of “science” for corporate profit. None of it was science, it was all corruption. When Ralph Nader pointed out that a study done by the American Medical Association proved that over 100,000 people a year die from pharmaceutical drugs when taken as directed in hospitals, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/187436 there was no media coverage, no daily death counts on the news, because the “news” is paid for and controlled by the pharmaceutical companies. That report was only about the people who were killed by pharmaceutical drugs in hospitals, which leaves out the hundreds of thousands more who are killed by pharmaceutical drugs that they take at home, and it’s only gotten worse since that first study was done. That also leaves out the even larger number of people who are injured, but not killed, by taking pharmaceutical drugs. These staggering amounts of deaths caused by the pharmaceutical companies for profit makes the pharmaceutical companies the most deadly industry in the world. And yet, there is no outcry from the media.
These are now the same pharmaceutical companies, media and corrupt government agencies who are now telling us that hundreds of thousands of people have been killed by Covid-19 and that their Covid-19 “vaccines” are safe and effective. However, the people who are looking at the actual science have discovered that these claims are not based on science at all. The evidence speaks for itself:
Not only had the government directed doctors and hospitals to list Covid-19 as the cause of death even if they haven’t tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but the PCR test being used doesn’t even test for the SARS-CoV-2 virus :
“The key to developing a successful PCR test is using a master copy of the genetic sequence that is pure and isolated. If the master copy is contaminated in any way, the test is considered unreliable. The SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes the illness Covid-19) master copy, used for PCR testing, was derived from a synthetic RNA strand combined with viral fragments manufactured by Chinese scientists.6 In other words, scientists made an educated guess at the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2. At the time of publishing this article, labs continue to use the synthetic virus even though a pure and isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated.7”
https://www.oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com/2020/12/pcr-tests-unraveled/
The “synthetic RNA strand” referred to above is a computer simulation that starts with fragments and then fills in the gaps. See: “Statement On Virus Isolation” https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
“A person shedding a large amount of active virus, and a person with leftover fragments from an infection that’s already been cleared, would receive the same – positive – test result.” https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54000629
This means the PCR test isn’t testing for a virus at all. It’s testing for DNA fragments. So, given that the original template used for developing the test wasn’t of an isolated virus, the fragments being tested for may not even be in the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.
What the PCR test does is amplify DNA fragments found in a sample. When you amplify it over 35 cycles, you get false positives, and most PCR testers have been amplifying it 40 cycles and more.
Even The New York Times wrote: “Your Coronavirus Test is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.” Published August 29, 2020
“A cycle threshold >35 is too sensitive. A more reasonable cutoff is Ct 30-35 or even Ct <30.” “PCR commonly uses 40 cycles of amplification, and each cycle doubles the target DNA. 3.3 cycles = a 10-fold change.”
The designer of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, created it to amplify DNA fragments for research purposes in the lab, not for diagnostic purposes. “Dr. Mullis and PCR test manufacturers agree it cannot be used to diagnose an active infection.24” https://www.oregoniansformedicalfreedom.com/2020/12/pcr-tests-unraveled/
Insert from sample COVID testing kit: “These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection.” https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/in-the-news/open-letter-to-dr-bonnie-henry-from-dr-stephen-malthouse/ (see footnote 18 in that link.)
To summarize, The Covid-19 death count is made up mostly of people who were already dying from 4 other causes, with no proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was even tested for, and, if it was tested for, it was tested by a PCR tests didn’t test for the actual virus, just DNA fragments and those fragments were amplified to a level that routinely gave false positives.
What I often hear from people when I point out these facts is “I trust the experts”. Despite the fact that the “experts” presented to us by the corporate media have been revealed to be corrupt corporate lackeys over and over again, let’s look specifically at the current ones.
News Week reported:
“…the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. (“gain-of-function” means making a virus more deadly.) In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million. Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.”
“…in October 2014, the US government had placed a federal moratorium on gain-of-function (GOF) research—altering natural pathogens to make them more deadly and infectious – as a result of rising fears about a possible pandemic caused by accidental or deliberate release of these genetically engineered monster germs.2
This was in part due to lab accidents at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in July 2014 that raised questions about biosafety at US high-containment labs.3
At that time, the CDC had closed two labs and halted some biological shipments in the wake of several incidents in which highly pathogenic microbes were mishandled by federal laboratories: an accidental shipment of live anthrax, the discovery of forgotten, live smallpox samples, and a newly revealed incident in which a dangerous influenza strain was accidentally shipped from CDC to another lab. A CDC internal report described how scientists failed to follow proper procedures to ensure samples were inactivated before they left the lab, and also found “multiple other problems” with operating procedures in the anthrax lab.4
As such in October 2014, due to public health concerns the US government banned all federal funding on efforts to weaponize three viruses—influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).5
In the face of a moratorium in the US, Dr. Anthony Fauci – director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and currently the leading doctor in the US Coronavirus Task Force – outsourced in 2015 the GOF research to China’s Wuhan lab and licensed the lab to continue receiving federal funding.6”
(Emphasis added) https://www.ispsw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/689_Lin.pdf
“What Tony Fauci does, NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) is supposed to look for the causes and also treatments for infectious diseases, for allergic diseases and autoimmune diseases. Tony Fauci does almost none of those things. What he’s done is he’s taken an enormous budget… which is now about $6 billion a year, plus another $1.7 billion a year that he gets from the Defense Department, which becomes part of his discretionary spending, and he invests that money in developing new drugs. He farms the money out to about 1,300 principal investigators who run their own little empires at Harvard, at NYU, at Berkeley, at MIT, and they begin the drug development forum. They do the clinical studies, and then when it gets to a certain point, he sells the drug or transfers it to one of the big pharmaceutical companies. But he does a deal with them where he splits the royalties for many of these drugs.”
“He owned a patent for a drug called interleukin, and it came to Congress’s attention because an internal agent in his investigation found that a lot of the trial subjects in that study were getting very sick and they were dying and there was suicidal ideation and that Fauci had not told them of that risk when he was recruiting them.”
“During the process of that investigation, it became clear that Fauci owned a patent for interleukin, and people were saying, “Wow, this guy isn’t telling people the risks of this. He’s going to make a lot of money on it.”
“So instead of researching and trying to stop all these chronic diseases from happening to our children, he’s ignoring all of that and simply essentially printing money. Let me tell you how important this is. In between 2009 and 2016, there were hundreds of drugs approved by FDA, and every single one of them came out of Tony Fauci’s shop. So that is the impact he has had on the pharmaceutical industry. During his tenure, the chronic disease rate has gone from 12% to 54%. We now use more drugs than any country in the world. We pay the highest prices for those drugs, and the drug industry is now controlling our government.”
“The slides below show a second Moderna contract that will give you a notion about the potential size of those royalty payments. That contract obligates the Pentagon to buy 500,000,000 doses for $9 billion.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/niaid-contract-pentagon-modernas-covid-vaccine/
Bill Gates has made many billions of dollars from his investments into vaccine companies, so he’s hardly a neutral player in this.
From the transcript of a documentary called “Who Is Bill Gates?”:
“And, as Gates also admits, it is not a spirit of selfless generosity that motivates his interest in vaccines and other lucrative health interventions.”
“BECKY QUICK: I’d like to talk to you about your approach to vaccinations. You wrote something recently, and, like you always do, you kind of looked at the problem from a scientific and business perspective on things. You’ve invested 10 billion dollars in vaccinations over the last two decades, and you figured out the return on investment for that. It kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?”
“BILL GATES: You know, we see a phenomenal track record. It’s been a hundred billion overall that the world’s put in—our foundation is a bit more than 10 billion—but we feel there’s been over a 20-to-one return. So if you just look at the economic benefits, that’s a pretty strong number compared to anything else.”
“As we have seen, Gates’ ‘philanthropic” investment scheme has paid off well, with his $50 billion net worth having ballooned to over $100 billion after his decade of “altruism” in the vaccine market. As critics of his foundation have repeatedly pointed out, the 9,000,000 people who die every year of hunger would be best served by securing food supplies, running water and other basic necessities, not costly medical interventions for rare diseases. But there is no return on investment to be made from that kind of charity.”
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
A very informative and well documented video and transcript, well worth watching. It also gives you good reasons to not trust the World Health Organization that he funds
“BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION KICKED OUT OF INDIA” by Pranavsinha
“Back in 2009, the Gates Foundation funded the trial of Gardasil (Merck and co.) on nearly sixteen thousand poor and vulnerable tribal school children of the state of Andhra Pradesh in India. Many among those children fell terribly ill and at least five among them died. At around the same time they conducted the trial of Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) on some fourteen thousand tribal children in Vadodara a place in Gujarat, another state of India. Because of this hundreds of those children fell terribly sick and at least two among them died. Upon investigation it was found that in both cases consent forms were forged.” ” But, eventually Gates Foundation was brought under trial in the Supreme Court of India. A couple of months ago it was kicked out this country.” https://steemit.com/life/@pranavsinha/bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-kicked-out-of-india
“Centre shuts health mission gate on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”
By Anubhuti Vishnoi
“All financial ties of the country’s apex immunisation advisory body, National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), with the Gates Foundation have been cut off.”
“Corona” viruses are the viruses that cause the common cold. They have been experimenting with vaccines for corona viruses for years and none of them were ever approved by the FDA because they were neither safe nor effective. In fact, they made the situation worse.
An article entitled “Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines” in Nature Reviews Microbiology reported:
“Vaccine safety remains a key question in phase III clinical trials and in the future application of vaccines, in particular for vaccine-related immunopathologies occurring when vaccinated people are naturally infected, as described below.”
“Lessons from SARS and MERS vaccines”
“A recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector expressing SARS-CoV S protein elicited a rapid and vigorous NAb response in ferrets; however, a strong inflammatory response in the liver of immunized ferrets occurred after challenge with SARS-CoV74,75.”
“More studies then demonstrated that SARS vaccines, based on either inactivated virus or a recombinant vector, could induce eosinophils and TH2 cell-skewed immune responses on subsequent challenge with SARS-CoV in a mouse model76,77,78,..” (emphasis added).
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y#ref-CR76
The word “challenge” in these reports refers to when the vaccinated animal encounters the natural virus after the vaccine. The results of being “challenged” by the natural virus after receiving the vaccine are increased pathological responses compared to the control group that did not receive the vaccines.
The article continues:
“Similarly, an inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine and a SARS-CoV S protein-derived peptide vaccine both induced severer lung damage in rhesus macaques after SARS-CoV challenge79.” (emphasis added)
An article entitled “Pfizer COVID vaccine trial shows alarming evidence of pathogenic priming in older adults” states:
December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — In the development of vaccines against coronaviruses like SARS-COV-1 and MERS in the early 2000’s, researchers found evidence of a serious problem. Teams of U.S. and foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs.
In a study published by The National Center for Biotechnology Information entitled “Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus”, researchers injected mice with an rDNA-produced S protein. The results were that “All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains.” (emphasis added)
“histopathologic changes” means “manifestations of disease”.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
All of this begs the question, how did the current batch of vaccines get past the failures of the previous animal studies with vaccines? The answer is: they just skipped doing those studies:
“Researchers fast-track coronavirus vaccine by skipping key animal testing first”
“Typically, vaccine development can take 15 to 20 years, start to finish, Mark Feinberg, president and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, told Stat News. The lengthy process requires that scientists first give the vaccine to animals to determine whether it’s safe and effective at preventing the disease in question. Only after passing through iterative tests in animal models, and being adjusted along the way, can a formulation be tested in human trials.”
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-no-animal-testing.html
In the article “Pfizer COVID vaccine trial shows alarming evidence of pathogenic priming in older adults” sited above it says: “…in the older group, the vaccinated group was 10 times more likely to have a SSAE upon receipt of the second vaccine dose than the first dose compared to the 1:1 ratio in the unvaccinated.”
“SSAE” means “solicited serious adverse events”. And, in this context “the older group” means over age 55, which is hardly representative of the over 70 age group.
From the New England Journal of Medicine, we find out that 21% of the trial participants reported one or more, severe systemic adverse events after getting the Moderna mRNA injection. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2022483
To add to the uncertainty, the current Covid-19 mRNA “vaccines” are not actually vaccines, they are genetic engineering on humans. For decades, the term “vaccine” meant an attenuated or killed virus or bacteria injected to stimulate the production of antibodies. The mRNA injections that are now being called “vaccines” are a completely different technology that has never been proven to be safe or effective, and they have never been approved by the FDA for use on humans. Even the current Covid-19 mRNA injections only have “emergency authorization”, because they haven’t gone through the testing required for FDA authorization:
“DIRE WARNING: PROMINENT VIROLOGIST DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI EXPOSES ‘MAJOR RISKS’ OF GENE-ALTERING”
“Prominent German virologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is warning German citizens about the detrimental effects of the gene-altering Chinese Coronavirus vaccine.
The first striking observation made by Dr. Bhakdi was that the vaccine, “developed in partnership with US pharma giant Pfizer” was not tested on individuals that are most likely to die of the coronavirus: elderly people with pre-existing conditions. In fact, Dr. Bhakdi specifically points out that the test subjects were “young, healthy people”. Still, “half of them had fever, chills, muscle aches, aching limbs, headaches, and they felt sick,” said the doctor.”
“Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi explains that the second “major risk” is the fact that the gene-altering Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination “can cause very serious allergic reactions.” The mRNA is described at the CDC as “a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases,” and Bhakdi has warned that this type of vaccine is “still unknown scientifically and medically.”
“The flu shot is known for putting a “weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies” in order to help build a body’s natural immunity to the virus. This is not the case with a mRNA vaccine, which uses existing cells to create a protein “found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19” that triggers an immune response, according to the CDC.”
“Back in September, RAIR Foundation quoted the doctor as saying that the coronavirus vaccine in development “isn’t a normal conventional vaccine, and it’s not like the flu vaccine.” He observed the irony that while many people are against “genetically modified food,” a vaccination “that genetically manipulates the human body” does not appear to garner concern.”
“The third risk from the coronavirus vaccine, Dr. Bhakdi explains, is that it can “contribute an adverse overreaction to subsequent naturally occurring infections.” Bhakdi continues to say that the potential overreaction can also affect “other viruses” as well.”
“…strangely enough, this vaccine can contribute an adverse overreaction to subsequent naturally occurring infections. And not just with this virus, also with other viruses, such as a flu virus. It causes an explosive immune overreaction.”
One of the main reasons a lot of people think that Covid-19 is a real threat is the corporate news was saying that hospitals are being overwhelmed with Covid-19 patients. The truth is, not only were most hospitals not being overwhelmed with Covid-19 cases, most hospitals experienced such a huge drop in patients that they had to lay off workers due to how many empty beds they had.
“Hospitals weren’t overrun by COVID-19, but now they face a new challenge: the budget”
“After unprecedented preparations—including filling the Long Beach Arena with cots and welcoming a 1,000-bed floating medical center off the coast—Long Beach hospitals have yet to experience the patient surge anticipated in the early days of the COVID-19 health crisis.”
“266 hospitals furloughing workers in response to COVID-19”
“Many U.S. hospitals and health systems have suspended elective procedures to save capacity, supplies and staff to treat COVID-19 patients.”
“As a result of suspending these nonemergent procedures, several systems have lost or expect to lose a large chunk of their annual revenue, forcing them to make cost reduction a top priority.”
“Houston Looking at Dismantling $17M Temp Hospital That Didn’t See a Single Patient”
“…while the hospital was constructed before Houston was experiencing peak resource usage, the city never came close to using enough beds to divert patients to the makeshift facility.”
“Financial fallout from COVID-19: 10 hospitals laying off workers” from Becker’s Hospital Review.
“U.S. hospitals are estimated to lose $200 billion between March 1 and June 30, according to a report from the American Hospital Association.”
From NPR “U.S. Field Hospitals Stand Down, Most Without Treating Any COVID-19 Patients”
“…nearly four months into the pandemic, most of these facilities haven’t treated a single patient.”
Of course you can find news reports of hospitals being overrun, but, as we already know, the corporate media lies.
“CBS News Caught Using Footage from an Italian Hospital to Describe Conditions in New York City”
“CBS News painted a dire picture from New York City this week in their coronavirus coverage. On Wednesday morning (March 25) CBS aired this footage from a New York hospital. The footage matches SKY News video from inside an Italian hospital from Sunday March 22.”
That means they showed video of an Italian hospital and claimed it was from a New York Hospital. They got caught and admitted it.
“CBS caught broadcasting ‘fake news on the coronavirus”
“Project Veritas have surveillance footage and inside reports proving the CBS had hospital workers pose as patients to make coronavirus testing lines look longer.”
You can see that footage yourself at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BUBTtUTOII
There have been many individual hospital staffers who have contradicted the media claims that their hospitals are overrun with Covid-19 patients, but YouTube and Facebook censor those as fast as they can. Don’t believe it?
“Facebook says it has taken down 7 million posts for spreading coronavirus misinformation”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/08/11/facebook-covid-misinformation-takedowns/
That 7 million taken down was just in one quarter, from April to June 2020. That’s a lot of censorship. I myself have heard first hand from hospital employees that our local hospitals were not overwhelmed by Covid-19 cases and did, in fact, let a lot of their staff go due to empty beds during the first wave of shut downs. Then on Nov. 18, I spoke with an employee of Asante in Medford who told me: “We’re not back up to full capacity yet, but they are starting to do some more elective surgeries.” That is, they still were not overwhelmed by Covid-19 cases.
And this from Google:
“Promoting helpful information is only one part of our responsibility. We’re also removing COVID-19 misinformation on YouTube, Google Maps, our developer platforms like Play, and across ads. On YouTube, we’ve taken down thousands of videos related to dangerous or misleading coronavirus information, and we continue to remove videos that promote medically unproven methods to prevent coronavirus in place of seeking medical treatment.” https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/covid-19-how-were-continuing-to-help/
They also censor doctors:
“Watch controversial press conference held by two Bakersfield doctors that was pulled down by YouTube”
If that link doesn’t work, it’s also here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UaiIETvK8I19/
Here’s another:
“Facebook, Google/YouTube, Twitter Censor Viral Video of Doctors’ Capitol Hill Coronavirus Press Conference”
I highly recommend watching both of those videos for two reasons. One is that they have valuable information. The other is so you can see for yourself what is actually being censored.
Facebook will tell you it’s fight against what it deems to be “disinformation” is based on more authoritative sources like “World Health Organization or local health authorities”
“Facebook’s efforts to fight disinformation about COVID-19 have included information cards on Instagram and Facebook, that redirect to sources like the World Health Organization or local health authorities.”
But that lie is uncovered because those two doctors who run 9 clinics in Kern County, California would qualify as being local authorities. Or how about Stanford University’s Hoover Institute’s public health expert Dr. Scott Atlas, M.D. Doesn’t he sound like a local authority?
“YouTube censors Stanford University-affiliated video featuring accomplished physician Scott Atlas because it ‘contradicts the World Health Organization’” https://www.theblaze.com/news/youtube-censors-stanford-scott-atlas-video
Speaking of the World Health Organization, their second largest funding source is Bill Gates, second only to the U.S. Government (see page 6 of their funding report), https://www.who.int/about/finances-accountability/reports/A72_INF5-en.pdf
A whole other aspect to this fraud is the government’s destruction of our society:
“Doctors Worldwide Are Recording More Deaths Due to Lockdowns Than to COVID-19”
“Over 34,000 Health Experts Sign Declaration Against COVID-19 Lockdowns, Petition by Epidemiologists Claims”
All of those shut downs are completely unnecessary because asymptomatic people don’t spread disease. Those people who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but have no symptoms, are not contagious. In “A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers” 455 people were subjected to contact with asymptomatic people who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 for 4 to 5 days. The results: “All CT images showed no sign of COVID-19 infection. No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts by nucleic acid test.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32513410/
That means people who have no symptoms don’t need to worry about spreading any disease to anyone else.
Which means masks aren’t needed. The studies show that, not only to masks not work to stop or even slow down the spread of infectious diseases, wearing them is harmful to your health.
Here is an image of a notice printed on a commercially sold box of face masks, warning people that masks don’t protect you from Covid-19. https://media.wusa9.com/assets/CCT/images/f87a27e8-b6b2-402c-9848-846e56cdc8cb/f87a27e8-b6b2-402c-9848-846e56cdc8cb_1920x1080.jpg
“An underreported, recently-published CDC study adds to the pile of evidence that cloth masks or other forms of mandated face coverings only contribute negatives to our COVID-19 problem. The study also displays — despite the constant accusations of widespread misbehavior from public health officials — that Americans are adhering to mask wearing, but mask wearing is not doing us any good. The CDC study, which surveyed symptomatic COVID-19 patients, has found that 70.6% of respondents reported “always” wearing a mask, while an additional 14.4% say they “often” wear a mask. That means a whopping 85% of infected COVID-19 patients reported habitual mask wearing. Only 3.9% of those infected said they “never” wear a face covering.” https://jordanschachtel.substack.com/p/cdc-85-of-covid-19-patients-report
“Physician and Medical Journal Editor: Healthy People Should Not Wear Face Masks” Russell Blaylock, MD
“Mask wearers frequently report symptoms of difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, headache, lightheadedness, dizziness, anxiety, brain fog, difficulty concentrating, and other subjective symptoms while wearing medical masks. As a surgeon, I have worn masks for prolonged periods of time in thousands of surgeries and can assure you these symptoms do occur when surgical masks are worn for extended periods of time. The longer a surgical mask is worn, the more saturated with moisture it becomes, and the more significantly it inhibits the inflow of oxygen and outflow of carbon dioxide.
In fact, clinical research shows that medical masks lower blood oxygen levels[R] and raise carbon dioxide blood levels.[R] The deviations in oxygen and carbon dioxide may not reach the clinical criteria for hypoxia (low blood oxygen), hypoxemia (low tissue oxygen), or hypercapnia (elevated blood carbon dioxide), but they can deviate enough to cause even healthy individuals to become symptomatic, as occurred with the surgeons studied and published in this report: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/?fbclid=IwAR07pASy2LOe3LzL6P0S8naRph9uUG-dlyg0xvn-ohfxHxhsqxZQx-ugXwg
The State mandates for wearing masks used to be against OSHA safety rules. Here’s an excellent short video of OSHA experts on masks: https://vrevealed.com/covid/sneak-peek/meghan-clark/
We don’t even need a vaccine because there are effective treatments:
After loudly proclaiming the results of studies that said that hydroxychloroquine wasn’t effective against Covid-19, the Lancet retracted two of those studies: https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/04/lancet-retracts-major-covid-19-paper-that-raised-safety-concerns-about-malaria-drugs/
In that same article is a link to a new “gold-standard clinical trial”, https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/03/hydroxychloroquine-does-not-prevent-covid-19-infection-in-people-who-have-been-exposed-study-says/ . But if you follow that link you find that the study was of asymptomatic people.
Another study touted by the press turned out to be on Chloroquine, not hydroxychloroquine, and also admitted that the problems came about with those patients that were given a “higher dose.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/12/health/chloroquine-coronavirus-trump.html
Another widely reported “study” that the corporate media said proved that hydroxychloroquine was killing people, was from the VA. However, it wasn’t a study. It was just an analysis of data, and the data was of the wrong thing. According to VA Secretary Robert Wilkie: “The records review reported outcomes where hydroxychloroquine alone was provided to our sickest COVID-19 patients.” (Emphasis added). In otherwords, they gave it to people who were on death’s door, and they died anyway. That was completely against the protocol for administering the drug. https://www.airforcemag.com/app/uploads/2020/04/VSO-Letter-4-29-2020.pdf
So the corporate media said that proved that hydroxychloroquine was killing people. Amazing isn’t it? Especially considering the fact that hydroxychloroquine is actually curing people and saving lives when given according to the recommended protocol.
Here is an actual study that did follow protocol:
“Treatment with hydroxychloroquine cut the death rate significantly in sick patients hospitalized with COVID-19 – and without heart-related side-effects, according to a new study published by Henry Ford Health System.”
https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study
Here’s another:
“Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin plus zinc vs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin alone: outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients” “After adjusting for the time at which zinc sulfate was added to our protocol, an increased frequency of being discharged home (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12-2.09) reduction in mortality or transfer to hospice remained significant.”
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.02.20080036v1
And this, from The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
“Hydroxychloroquine Has about 90 Percent Chance of Helping COVID-19 Patients”
“To date, the total number of reported patients treated with HCQ, with or without zinc and the widely used antibiotic azithromycin, is 2,333, writes AAPS, in observational data from China, France, South Korea, Algeria, and the U.S. Of these, 2,137 or 91.6 percent improved clinically.”
https://aapsonline.org/hcq-90-percent-chance/
Here’s a real shocker: “US Has Almost 30 Times More COVID-19 Deaths per Population than Third-World Countries that Promoted Early HCQ Use”
Here are the studies: https://c19study.com/
So the corporate media loudly broadcasts discredited and flawed “studies” and ignores studies that show hydroxychloroquine saves lives. Why do you suppose that is?
Hydroxychloroquine isn’t the only pharmaceutical treatment that helps. Corticosteroids such as dexamethasone have also been shown to help. Even the W.H.O. admits it:
“Inexpensive steroids reduce deaths of hospitalized Covid-19 patients, WHO analysis confirms.” “The first evidence that common steroids could improve the survival of patients with severe Covid-19 came in June when British researchers conducting a large clinical trial called RECOVERY reported that the use of dexamethasone reduced the death rate by 35% in patients requiring ventilation and by 20% in patients who needed oxygen but were not ventilated.”
What’s more, there are natural remedies and preventatives that work far better than any vaccine. Here’s just one of them one of them:
See Attachment “Vitamin D and Covid-19, Dr. Edward Kellogg”
As long as this email is, it’s still just the tip of the iceberg. I have many more links to studies and articles on many aspects of the fraud. Let me know if you would like to see more.
Thank you for considering this evidence,
Eli Dumitru